Apple and Samsung Flagship Devices Are Harder to Repair Than Competitors

Apple and Samsung Flagship Devices Are Harder to Repair Than Competitors

PIRG Study Analyzes Apple and Samsung Repair Systems and Shows Motorola and ASUS Lead in Mobile and Laptop Maintainability Design Grades

The study investigates the two main market dynamics which operate through two opposing systems that lead to market control and product maintenance practices across Apple and Samsung. The American consumer protection group PIRG conducted a recent study which demonstrated that people cannot maintain their mobile phones because of the high demand for these devices. The analysis suggests that despite dominating the global market, the flagship devices produced by industry titans are often significantly harder to service than those manufactured by smaller, more agile competitors.

According to the European Product Register for Energy Labeling data, currently, Motorola leads in user friendly hardware design because it achieved a B+ grade. Google received a C rating for mid range products while Samsung and Apple received D and D ratings as the industry leaders in visibility. The assessment criteria examined all aspects of a system by focusing on three elements: the accessibility of all internal parts, the availability of authentic replacement components in the market, and the difficulty level of using consumer oriented diagnostic documentation.

The research shows current design methods lead to design faults which the study confirms through its findings. The study used five Samsung devices because the company did not register its latest models in the database until after their launch. The other brands tested their systems against a complete range of ten devices, which showed their repair systems through better assessment. The present data set contains this registration visibility issue as an active factor.

The critique extended beyond the handset market into the laptop sector, where ASUS emerged as the frontrunner for maintainability. Apple maintained its position as the least advanced company in that particular category. The PIRG study demonstrates how manufacturers' design decisions which focus on creating attractive products compete with the public's need for devices that last longer than their current user interface.

About the author

mgtid
Owner of Technetbook | 10+ Years of Expertise in Technology | Seasoned Writer, Designer, and Programmer | Specialist in In-Depth Tech Reviews and Industry Insights | Passionate about Driving Innovation and Educating the Tech Community Technetbook

Join the conversation